http://www.forbes.com/2007/12/13/micros … artner=msn
I can’t believe people are writing stuff like this. VMware has a product that’s better in VMware Server and it’s free too!
Read this http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/12/ … iew_1.html and see that you should really be using VMware server which is free and better than HyperV!
notes came from here:
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/116768
Hi,
i managed to get my ESX3.5 to boot and run on a HP ML 115.
onboard raid: yes, this “raid” really sucks, because my rescue cd found 2 controllers/disks -> NO RAID
TODO-List to get ESX-3.5 up and running.
1.) install it from the cd (of course)
2.) reboot with a linux live cd of your choice.
and now i hope that there are no typos…because i created this “script” on my laptop during i tried and tested it on my ESX box!
mkdir /mnt/eboot
mkdir /mnt/eroot
1. /boot of ESX box
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/eboot
1. /root of ESX box
mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/eroot
mkdir /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd
mkdir /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd/extracted
mkdir /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd/extractednew
cp /mnt/eboot/boot/initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd
cd /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd
mv initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.gz
gunzip initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.gz
mount initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img extracted -o loop
cd extracted
cd etc/vmware
cp simple.map simple.map.org
vi simple.map
2nd go for SED!
search for 037e
double this line
change one 037e to 037f
save
cd ..
cd ..
dd if=dev/zero of=initrd.img bs=1k count=97000
mke2fs -i 1024 -b 1024 -m 5 -F -v initrd.img
mount initrd.img extractednew -t ext2 -o loop
tar -C extracted/ -cmf – . | tar -C extractednew/ -xmf – .
1. umount initrd.img
umount extracted
umount extractednew
gzip -best initrd.img
ls -alh
mv initrd.img.gz initrd.img
cd /mnt/eboot
mv initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.org
cp /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd/initrd.img initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img
cd /mnt/eroot
cd etc
cd vmware
cp pci.ids pci.ids.org
vi pci.ids
2nd go for SED!
search for 037e
double this line
change one 037e to 037f
save
cp pci.xml.merged pci.xml.merged.org
vi pci.xml.merged
2nd go for SED!
search for 037e
double this SECTION
change one 037e to 037f
save
cd pciid
cp sata_nv.xml sata_nv.xml.org
vi sata_nv.xml
2nd go for SED!
search for 037e
double this SECTION
change one 037e to 037f
save
reboot from your resuce system into ESX and JUCHEEEEE….
kind regards,
Reinhard
________________________________________________________________________________________
#!/bin/bash
vmware esx initrd changer
#/bin/bash
Reinhard Partmann
date created: 2007-12-17
date modified: 2007-12-17
version: 0.2
echo “creating directories…”
mkdir -p /mnt/eboot
mkdir -p /mnt/eroot
echo “mounting..”
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/eboot
mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/eroot
mount | grep sda
echo “copying original initrd file…”
mkdir -p /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd/extracted
cp /mnt/eboot/initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd/initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.gz
cd /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd
echo “unpacking & mounting original initrd file…”
gunzip -f initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.gz
mount initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img extracted -t ext2 -o loop
cd extracted
cd etc
cd vmware
echo “changing simple.map…”
echo “10de:037f 0000:0000 sata_nv.o” >> simple.map
cd ..
cd ..
cd ..
umount extracted
echo “replacing original initrd file…”
gzip –best initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img
mv /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd/initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.gz /mnt/eboot/
cp /mnt/eboot/initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img.gz /mnt/eboot/initrd-2.4.21-47.0.1.ELvmnix.img
echo “patching xml files”
cd /mnt/eroot/etc/vmware/pciid
lines=`wc -l sata_nv.xml | awk ‘ { print $1 } ‘`
echo “lines: $lines”
(( lines -= 2))
echo “subtr lines: $lines”
mv sata_nv.xml sata_nv.xml.org
head -$lines sata_nv.xml.org > sata_nv.xml
echo ” ” >> sata_nv.xml
echo ” ” >> sata_nv.xml
echo ” sata_nv” >> sata_nv.xml
echo ” ” >> sata_nv.xml
echo ” MCP55 SATA Controller” >> sata_nv.xml
echo ” ” >> sata_nv.xml
echo ” ” >> sata_nv.xml
echo “” >> sata_nv.xml
touch /mnt/eroot/etc/init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
echo “#!/bin/bash” >> /mnt/eroot/etc/init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
echo “esxcfg-pciid” >> /mnt/eroot/etc/init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
echo “sleep 5″ >> /mnt/eroot/etc/init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
echo “rm /etc/rc3.d/S99rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot” >> /mnt/eroot/etc/init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
chmod a+x /mnt/eroot/etc/init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
cd /mnt/eroot/etc/rc3.d/
ln -s ../init.d/rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot S99rp-esxcfg-pciid-boot
echo “cleanup…”
cd /
rm -f -r /mnt/eroot/tmp/initrd
umount /mnt/eboot
umount /mnt/eroot
rm -f -r /mnt/eboot
rm -f -r /mnt/eroot]]>
This is a total load of FUD. Like most of the comments here, I must agree. Even WHEN this so-called HyperV does come out, it still will lack the features that VMware currently HAS! If you’re already running VMware, why would you DOWNGRADE!? If you’re not, why would you adopt an UNPROVEN LOSER 1.0 release!? Just like a lot of people are upgrading from Vista to XP, people will be upgrading from HyperV to VI3, which will be 2 years OLD by the time HyperV comes out. VMware stays atop for at least 5 years as nobody comes close just yet.
Here’s the story:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/m … teid=yhoof
In the guest, you’ll want to run NTP and not use the VMware tools time sync. It seems to work better. Also, you might also considering Ubuntu 7.1.0 instead as with ESX 3.5, VMware Server 2.0, and Workstation 6.0, it has a VMI option, so that you can run a paravirtualized kernel and get up to 30% better performance. It also doesn’t have the LSILogic scsi driver bug that everyone seems to run into.
If anyone didn’t know, you should know now. I used to just think like … if it worked, why change. Well, there were a lot of videos that I couldn’t watch before and with VLC player, I could! It must be certain bits that are missing or something from the files Windows Media Player wouldn’t play it. VLC will!
You can get VLC Media Player for free here:
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
NEW YORK (AP) — A Jefferies & Co. analyst downgraded Red Hat Inc., saying competing technologies are nabbing market share and could hurt profit growth, as the software maker deals with rivalry by making acquisitions.
Katherine Egbert in a client note cut her rating on Red Hat to “Hold” from “Buy” and reduced her target price to $19 from $23.
Red Hat will have to work to diversify its business away from its Red Hat Enterprise Linux products, which are based on open-source software, Egbert said. That’s because newer virtualization technologies, which allow businesses to use different computer operating systems on a single server, are replacing Linux servers as companies work to cut costs, Egbert wrote.
Often new servers are shipped with a key competing product from VMware Inc., which is cutting into Linux market share, she added.
But Red Hat is diversifying through acquisitions and could step up this process, Egbert said, which could eat into earnings potential.
This is total bullshit for lack of a better term. What in the hell does VMware have to do with Red Hat? They are new and coming into the Virtualization space! VMware actually allows OS vendors to sell more licenses!
Let’s see here “virtualization technologies, which allow businesses to use different computer operating systems on a single server, are replacing Linux servers as companies work to cut costs” … what the fuck!? So you’re running different operating systems … what operating systems might they be? Windows (costs money), more Linux? Probably! They’ll be running other operating systems … just less computers!
Anyone else with any input on this?
ipchains-save output from a firewall
*filter
:INPUT DROP [3229:322102]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT DROP [0:0]
:icmp-in – [0:0]
:icmp-out – [0:0]
:log-and-drop – [0:0]
:valid-source-address – [0:0]
:valid-source-address-udp – [0:0]
:valid-tcp-flags – [0:0]
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -j valid-tcp-flags
-A INPUT -p ! udp -j valid-source-address
-A INPUT -p udp -j valid-source-address-udp
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j valid-source-address
-A INPUT -p icmp -j icmp-in
-A INPUT -m state –state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp –dport 80 -m state –state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp –dport 443 -m state –state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp –dport 22 -m state –state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -m udp –dport 123 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -j valid-tcp-flags
-A OUTPUT -p icmp -j icmp-out
-A OUTPUT -p udp -m udp –sport 1024:65535 –dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp –sport 1024:65535 –dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -m state –state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -j REJECT –reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
-A icmp-in -p icmp -m icmp –icmp-type 0 -j ACCEPT
-A icmp-in -p icmp -m icmp –icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
-A icmp-in -p icmp -m icmp –icmp-type 3/4 -j ACCEPT
-A icmp-in -j DROP
-A icmp-out -p icmp -m icmp –icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
-A icmp-out -p icmp -m icmp –icmp-type 0 -j ACCEPT
-A icmp-out -j DROP
-A log-and-drop -j LOG –log-level 7 –log-tcp-options –log-ip-options
-A log-and-drop -j DROP
-A valid-source-address -s 127.0.0.1 -j DROP
-A valid-source-address -s 0.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -j DROP
-A valid-source-address -d 255.255.255.255 -j DROP
-A valid-source-address-udp -s 127.0.0.1 -j DROP
-A valid-source-address-udp -s 0.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -j DROP
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,PSH,ACK,URG NONE -j log-and-drop
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags FIN,ACK FIN -j log-and-drop
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags PSH,ACK PSH -j log-and-drop
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags ACK,URG URG -j log-and-drop
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags FIN,SYN FIN,SYN -j log-and-drop
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN,RST -j log-and-drop
-A valid-tcp-flags -p tcp -m tcp –tcp-flags FIN,RST FIN,RST -j log-and-drop
COMMIT
In reference to:
http://mmamovement.com/shogun-picking-w … k-liddell/
It’s hard to say. I think that Wanderlei’s got a shot, but I think that Liddell’s got enough power to take Wanderlei out. We’ll see. I definitely will take Machida over Sokoudjou though. If you saw his fight prior to those against Arona and Lil Nogueira, you’ll see that the guy that boxed him (don’t remember his name – look him up on Sherdog.com), actually outboxed him and knocked him out. Those two guys didn’t try to box, but tried to grapple him. I think that Machida takes this as long as he doesn’t get hit and he’s so elusive that I don’t think he will.
I agree with Ibarra. I think Page will take them both. Page had a good excuse for losing against Silva both times. Also, the rules are different in Pride. That’s why Crocop was able to win more often – they stood the fighters up more. Rampage can hold Silva down and beat him by GnP or LnP whatever you call it in the UFC where he couldn’t do it in Pride. I think Henderson had a better chance, but he lost too.